|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NN/g Home |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ask Tog, October, 1998Website Navigation BarsHi, Tog
Let us assume for this discussion that such a deep hierarchy is unavoidable and let us further assume that the users are somewhat average people using the site with some frequency. (Were I to consult on this project, the first thing I would do is find out if four hierarchical levels are really necessary. Then I would want to know exactly who these users are.) Nav bars for computer professionals serve one primary purpose: Giving us a fast way to get from point A to point B. They serve a second, often more important role for more average users: They give the user a map. Let's consider Stu's three alternatives in light of their mapping features. Solution one, the main menu, offers little help in building a mental model of the site. It is rather like having a state road map consisting of a single sheet of paper with the names of the five largest cities on it. No roads, no small towns. Jakob's solution (2) has the advantage of being simple and compact. It is rather like the breadcrumb map of Hansel and Gretel, but with longer-lasting breadcrumbs (subject to the reliability of your system). It is targeted at computer professionals and, as such, is well-suited. Stu's solution (3) really "turns on the lights." Users will know where they are, where they've been, and how to go to their next destination. It requires no mental-modeling and will aid learnability, as well as increase usability. This solution does, as Stu pointed out, take up a fair amount of space. I would suggest sticking with the general concept, but let a graphic designer take a whack at it, producing four or five variations, with particular emphasis on collapsing the vertical height. For example, were the items in bold in a vertical column on the left, each of the subsequent columns could begin at the top of the page, rather than being staggered down. Not quite so eloquent as this design, but significantly more compact. As I said in The Sorry State of Web Design, mapping such as this should become part of site management systems, offered by HTML editor vendors, as well as ISPs. Site webmasters should only have to pick a given style or design, with all the mapping happening automatically. As compact, easily-understood solutions emerge, they should become standard, so that users aren't faced with a diffferent design on each website. That hasn't happened yet, but it should not be much longer. In the meantime, Stu, you are definitely headed in the right direction. Send your own questions to me. I'll either try to answer you personally or make your letter the centerpiece of next month's issue. -Tog |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||